Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr 24;22(13):4270–4279. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4547-7

Table 1.

Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with DCIS who underwent SLNDa

Negative SLN
(n=1102)
Positive SLN findings
(n=132)
P valuec
(Neg vs pos SLN)
P valued
(ITCs vs mets)
ITCs
(n=66)
Metastases b
(n=66)
Age, years   .001 .168
 Mean 54.9 52.8 50.4
 Median (range) 54.0 (21–90) 51.5 (32–76) 49.0 (29–80)
Biopsy method e   .099 .010
 Percutaneous only 878 (90.1) 42 (4.3) 55 (5.6)
 Excisional 224 (86.5) 24 (9.3) 11 (4.2)
Biopsy histologic subtype
 Solid 683 (90.1) 35 (4.6) 40 (5.3)   .250 .380
 Cribriform 563 (88.1) 43 (6.7) 33 (5.2)   .159 .078
 Papillary 276 (83.9) 27 (8.2) 26 (7.9) <.001 .859
 Comedonecrosis 798 (89.1) 52 (5.8) 46 (5.1)   .656 .232
Reason for SLND
 High grade 559 (89.9) 30 (4.8) 33 (5.3)   .515 .601
 DCIS size >2 cm f 548 (86.7) 47 (7.4) 37 (5.9)   .003 .070
 Palpable tumor 131 (81.9) 13 (8.1) 16 (10.0)   .001 .528
 Microinvasion suspicion 196 (82.4) 19 (8.0) 23 (9.7) <.001 .455
 Total mastectomy 841 (88.7) 52 (5.5) 55 (5.8)   .222 .505
Total no. of biopsies g   .030 .878
 Mean 1.29 1.52 1.52
 Median (range) 1 (0–5) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–4)
Total no. of surgeries h   .007 <.001
 Mean 1.31 1.65 1.23
 Median (range) 1 (1–4) 2 (1–3) 1 (1–3)
Total no. of interventions i <.001 .011
 Mean 2.60 3.17 2.74
 Median (range) 2 (1–8) 3 (2–6) 2 (1–7)
Total needle localizations   .519 .114
 Mean 0.5 0.6 0.4
 Median (range) 0 (0–4) 0 (0–3) 0 (0–3)
Final pathologic diagnosis <.001 <.001
 Pure DCIS 851 (93.8) 44 (4.9) 12 (1.3)
 Microinvasive cancer 57 (83.8) 6 (8.8) 5 (7.4)
 Invasive cancer 194 (74.9) 16 (6.2) 49 (18.9)
Pathologic size of DCIS * <.001 .258
 Mean 3.8 5.6 6.6
 Median (range) 3.0 (0–19.0) 4.3 (0.3–18.0) 6.5 (0.1–20.0)
ER status *   .033 .405
 Positive 695 (89.6) 37 (4.8) 44 (5.7)
 Negative 227 (84.7) 22 (8.2) 19 (7.1)
 Unknown 180 (94.7) 7 (3.7) 3 (1.6)
PR status * .029 .837
 Positive 525 (90.2) 27 (4.6) 30 (5.2)
 Negative 393 (85.8) 32 (7.0) 33 (7.2)
 Unknown 184 (94.8) 7 (3.6) 3 (1.5)
Modified BNG j*   .808 .862
  I 61 (91.0) 3 (4.5) 3 (4.5)
  II 349 (88.8) 24 (6.1) 20 (5.1)
 III 580 (88.4) 36 (5.5) 40 (6.1)
 Unknown 112 (94.9) 3 (2.5) 3 (2.5)
Follow-up time, months   .799 .061
 Mean 68.0 62.1 75.7
 Median (range) 61.8 (0.7–171) 55.7 (8.7–149) 71.9 (8.6–165)

BNG, Black’s Nuclear Grade; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; ER, estrogen receptor; ITCs, isolated tumor cells; mets, metastases; no., number; PR, progesterone receptor; SLN, sentinel lymph node; SLND, SLN dissection.

a

Values in table are number of patients (percentage) unless otherwise indicated.

b

Metastases includes micrometastases and macrometastases.

c

Comparison between negative SLN group versus positive SLN group.

d

Comparison within group with positive SLN findings (isolated tumor cells versus SLN metastases).

e

Method was classified as excisional if the patient underwent 1 or more excisional or incisional biopsies.

f

Size is greatest measurable diameter of lesion or calcifications on mammography or ultrasonography.

g

All percutaneous biopsies.

h

All excisional biopsies and surgeries.

i

Sum of total biopsies and total surgeries.

j

Grade I, well differentiated; grade II, moderately differentiated; grade III, poorly differentiated.

*

Excluded unknown values in statistics calculations.