Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jan 10;41(2):359–368. doi: 10.1111/acer.13293

Table 4.

Hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) from multivariate Cox proportional hazard models for time from first drink to onset of DSM-5 AUD

Predictor (risk period [years since first drink]) Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Parental AUD
Father AUD, mother unaffected 1.15(0.95-1.39)
Mother AUD, father unaffected 1.25 (1.01-1.55)
Both parents AUD 1.28 (1.04-1.57)
Mother or father unaffected, co-parent status AUD possible 1.44 (1.01-2.05)
Mother or father unaffected, co-parent status unknown 0.70 (0.38-1.32)
Neither parent affected 1.00 (referent group)
Parental Separation 0.86 (0.74-1.01)
Cannabis usea 2.52 (2.07-3.06)
Internalizinga 1.42(1.23-1.63)
Externalizinga 1.80 (1.55-2.10)
Assaultive trauma 1.12 (0.96-1.30)
Non-assaultive traumaa 1.14 (.99-1.32)
Perceived substance use of peers 1.36(1.08-1.70)

Interactions between predictor variable and years since first drink were modeled to satisfy the proportional hazards assumption when the assumption was violated.

Other covariates included were: offspring birth cohort (1982-86 (referent), 1987-89, 1990-93, 1994 and later; Gender; African American v non-African American background; Income (<$30,000, $30,000-<$75,000, >= $75,000); case (v comparison) family status; and indicator variables for age at first drink (12 and younger, 13,14,15,17,18, and 19 or older. 16 was the median age and used as the referent).

a

defined as time-varying