Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016 Dec 26;237:22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.12.008

Table 1.

Respiratory frequency and tidal volume during baseline conditions (0% O2) and during exposure to two levels of hypercapnia for rats reared in 21% O2 (Control) or 60% O2 (Hyperoxia).

Age Treatment n Mass (g) Respiratory Frequency(breaths min−1) Tidal Volume (ml 100g−1)

Baseline 4% CO2 8% CO2 Baseline 4% CO2 8% CO2
P4 Control 20 10.6±0.2 164±4 166±4 159±5 0.93±0.05 1.22±0.07 # 1.47±0.07 #
Hyperoxia 19 10.3±0.3 129±4 * 132±5 * 130±4 * 0.74±0.04 * 0.89±0.04 *, # 1.11±0.05 *, #

P6-7 Control 17 15.1±0.3 161±8 156±6 149±6 # 0.74±0.03 0.94±0.04 # 1.17±0.04 #
Hyperoxia 16 14.8±0.4 132±3 * 133±3 * 129±2 *, # 0.66±0.06 0.83±0.09 # 1.05±0.11 #

P13-14 Control 18 32.2±1.0 143±5 172±7 # 180±6 # 0.75±0.02 1.02±0.03 # 1.31±0.04 #
Hyperoxia 15 29.9±0.9 130±5 * 158±5 *, # 162±5 *, # 0.69±0.03 * 0.88±0.04 *, # 1.19±0.05 *, #

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

*

P<0.05 vs. Control at the same level of inspired CO2 (i.e., post hoc test for main effect of developmental treatment) and

#

P<0.05 vs. Baseline within the same developmental treatment (i.e., post hoc test for main effect of inspired CO2). Body mass did not differ between treatment groups at any age.