Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 18;69(2):227–240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.454

TABLE 2.

Suicide-Related EM-Relevant Firearm Injury Research Questions

Directly Relevant to ED Clinical Practice
  • 1.

    What are the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of key stakeholders (e.g. healthcare providers, families, patients) that may facilitate or impede lethal means restriction for suicidal patients?

  • 2.

    What are the consequences (if any) of firearm screening among suicidal patients? Does it dissuade them from seeking care?

  • 3.

    Is failure to screen for firearm access in a patient with suicide risk malfeasance or breach of duty by the physician?

  • 4.

    How does, and how should, knowing that a potentially suicidal patient has a gun at home influence disposition decision? (What should the standard of practice be?)

  • 5.

    What are barriers and facilitators to ED provider counseling of suicidal patients (and family members) about lethal means?

  • 6.

    What factors increase the acceptability of lethal means restriction for at-risk patients? E.g., with whom are at-risk persons most comfortable temporarily storing their firearms?

  • 7.

    To what extent do ED interactions with suicide hotlines/other community partners affect patients’ lethal means access post discharge?

General EM-Relevant Research
  • 8.

    What factors, including online and in-person social networks, affect initial suicide method choice and method substitution?

  • 9.

    What is the epidemiology of firearm suicide? Specifically: how does gun ownership, storage, gun origin, etc., vary across various demographic groups (e.g. youth, veterans, etc.)?*

  • 10.

    What is the effect of firearm access restriction on future suicide behavior?*