Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Sep 5;25(12):1343–1353. doi: 10.1002/pds.4076

Table 3.

Summary of probabilistic bias analysis when simulating misclassification, sorted by study design

Study Type of
misclassification
simulated
Source of bias
parameter
estimates
Type of
probability
distribution
assigned to bias
parameters*
Bias parameters for
which assigned range of
values were reported
Simulated
iterations
Cohort studies
Ahrens et al. (2012)38 Differential exposure
misclassification
(binary)
Internal validation
data and
external validation
study
Beta PPV and time of
initiation
100,000
Brunet et al. (2015)43 Nondifferential
exposure
misclassification
(binary)
External validation
studies
Trapezoidal Sensitivity and
specificity
Not reported
Huybrechts et al. (2014)39 Nondifferential
outcome
misclassification
(binary)
Internal validation
study
Triangular Sensitivity and
specificity
1,000
Palmsten et al. (2013)40 Nondifferential
outcome
misclassification
(binary)
Internal validation
study
Not reported Not reported Not reported

Case-control studies
Barron et al. (2013)41 Nondifferential
Outcome
misclassification;
differential
outcome
misclassification
(binary) §
External validation
study; expert
judgement
Trapezoidal Sensitivity and
specificity
5,000
5,000
Mahmud et al. (2011)42 Nondifferential
exposure
misclassification
Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported

NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value

*

See eFigure 1 in the online supplementary appendix for further description of probability distribution types.

Bias parameters for misclassification include classification probabilities (sensitivity/specificity and/or PPV/NPV). We report whether investigators discussed the range of plausible values assigned to bias parameters

Simulated a time-varying exposure required estimating time-to-initiation, which investigators simulated by fitting probability distributions to the range of times observed in their cohort. Only sensitivity and specificity point estimates were provided for the calculation of NPV.

§

Simulated both nondifferential and differential outcome misclassification