Table 2.
Logistic regression model for predicting odds of ID/IDA (Zhejiang) and IDA or ID (Hebei)
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P value | |
| ID/IDA vs. IS (Zhejiang) | ||||
| BF | 28.8 (3.7 – 226.4) | < .001 | - | - |
| MF | 11.0 (1.2 – 103.2) | .04 | - | - |
| FF | Reference | - | - | |
| IDA vs. IS (Hebei) | ||||
| BF | 50.7 (18.2 – 140.7) | < .001 | 78.8 (27.2 – 228.1) | < .001 |
| MF | 15.8 (5.6 – 44.5) | < .001 | 21.0 (7.3 – 60.9) | < .001 |
| FF | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| Male sex | - | - | 1.7 (1.1 – 2.5) | .01 |
| Fetal-neonatal ID vs. IS | - | - | 2.4 (1.6 – 3.5) | < .001 |
| Birth weight1 | - | - | 0.91 (0.86 – 0.96) | .001 |
| Weight gain to 9 months1 | - | - | 1.05 (1.03 – 1.07) | < .001 |
| Age at testing, months | - | - | 0.6 (0.3 – 0.9) | .01 |
| ID vs. IS (Hebei) | ||||
| BF | 18.1 (8.1 – 40.3) | < .001 | 21.9 (9.7 – 49.7) | < .001 |
| MF | 6.3 (2.7 – 14.4) | < .001 | 6.7 (2.9 – 15.4) | < .001 |
| FF | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| Male sex | - | - | 1.8 (1.2 – 2.7) | .005 |
| Log C-reactive protein at 9 months, mg/L | - | - | 0.8 (0.7 – 0.9) | .001 |
1
Per 100 g.