Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 30;4(1):47–53. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw037

Table 1.

Clinical data compared between two groups

Prevention group Non-prevention group P-values
Patient, n 18 37
Mean age, y 74.89 ± 6.18 75.51 ± 8.71 0.787
Sex, No. F:M 15:3 30:7 0.774
Mean height, m 1.60 ± 0.79 1.61 ± 0.83 0.703
Mean weight, kg 59.16 ± 7.92 58.19 ± 8.98 0.695
Mean BMI, kg/m2 23.03 ± 2.10 22.46 ± 3.08 0.471
L1–4 mean BMD 0.678 ± 0.118 0.691 ± 0.127 0.769
Hip total BMD 0.601 ± 0.120 0.641 ± 0.269 0.604
Cement disk leakage, n 3 8 0.666
Sandwich vertebra, n 24 47
Thoracic–lumbar, n 17 32 0.813
Cobb angle of SV 5.28 ± 3.62 3.92 ± 3.17 0.195
Compression rate of SV 0.90 ± 0.10 0.93 ± 0.07 0.107

No significance between two groups. BMI, body mass index; BMD, bone mineral density; SV, sandwich vertebra. Cobb angle and compression rate of sandwich vertebra were measured by lateral spinal radiographs within 1 day after procedure.