Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2016 Aug 24;35:434–445. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006

Figure 5. voxel-wise t statistic comparison from STC data and uncorrected data in the LSF ROI in simulated data for various noise and motion levels with interleave 6.

Figure 5

STC was carried out with three methods: FSL, SPM, and FS. The analysis was carried out for high, medium, and low motion cases, as well as three different SNR conditions (Noise 20 indicates that 20% of the signal’s energy is from white noise, and so on). Each violin plot contains values from 20 scans. Higher values indicate that a STC method had higher z scores than data that was analyzed with no STC. Two stars indicate that these z differences are also significantly different from our method (FS), t<0.001, one star indicates significance p<0.05.