Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 30;11:29. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00029

Table 5.

Correlation matrix of proficiency measure and self-ratings on certainty and motivation with behavioral and ERP measures per round.

RT correct Accuracy ERN effect FRN effect
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
LexTALE −0.39 −0.55** −0.47* 0.62*** 0.47* 0.41 0.44* −0.03 0.05 0.01 0.53** 0.03
Certainty rating −0.29 −0.29 −0.36 0.51* 0.61*** 0.75*** 0.47* 0.15 0.65*** −0.02 0.49* 0.62***
Motivation 0.14 −0.01 −0.10 0.13 0.31 −0.08 0.19 −0.14 −0.31 −0.12 0.17 0.22
Perfectionism −0.08 −0.21 −0.12 0.37 0.62*** 0.40 0.21 0.26 0.31 −0.20 0.32 0.48*
Confidence −0.44* −0.48* −0.34 0.21 0.06 −0.12 0.29 0.20 −0.03 −0.02 0.37 −0.19
Perseverance −0.16 −0.30 −0.07 0.52* 0.51* 0.10 0.53** −0.01 0.01 −0.38 0.57** 0.00

Significance level:

***

<0.003; levels of

**

< 0.01,

*

<0.05 were not significant with the Bonferroni correction, N = 23.

Correlations are based on Spearman's rho values; for LexTALE score Pearson's r is reported. ERN effect reflects the amplitude difference ERN-CRN; the FRN effect is based on the amplitude difference FRN negative-FRN positive.