Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;55(2):574–584. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02087-16

TABLE 1.

Clinical characteristics of seven M. intracellulare patients who responded to BDQ and then relapsed

Patient Age (yr) Disease typea Duration of prior treatment (mo) Companion drugs while on BDQb Resistance
AFB smear status
7H11 agar culture status
Macrolide Amikacin Pretreatment Lowest on BDQ Relapse Pretreatment Lowest on BDQ Relapse
1c 54 FN + C 96 EMB, RFB, STR Yes No 4+ Negative 3+ 4+ Negative 4+
2c 60 NB 25 AZM, EMB, RFB, STR No No 4+ Negative 3+ 4+ Negative 4+
3 68 FN + C 48 AMK, EMB, RFB Yes No 3+ Negative 2+ 4+ Negative 2+
4 71 NB + C AMK, AZM, EMB, STR No No 3+ Negative 2+ 4+ Negative 3+
5c 58 NB 78 EMB, RFB, STR Yes Yes 4+ 2+ 4+ 4+ 3+ 4+
6 66 NB + C 44 AMK, EMB, RFB Yes Yes 3+ Negative 2+ 3+ +d 3+
7 64 FN + C 20 CLR, EMB, RFB, STR No No 3+ Negative 3+ 4+ Negative 3+
a

FN, fibronodular; NB, nodular bronchiectasis; C, cavitary.

b

AMK, amikacin; AZM, azithromycin; CLR, clarithromycin; EMB, ethambutol; RFB, rifabutin; STR, streptomycin.

c

Previously described by Philley et al. (15).

d

Only 8 CFU were observed.