Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 16;2017:6080648. doi: 10.1155/2017/6080648

Table 2.

Test-retest reliability of SAT II follow-up scores among stable subjects (EQ-5D VAS < 20% and BPI-DN item 5 < 20%): week 8 to week 12.

SAT II domains EQ-5D VAS < 20%1 BPI-DN item 5 < 20%2
N Mean (SD) week 8 Mean (SD) week 12 Difference3 ICC4 N Mean (SD) week 8 Mean (SD) week 12 Difference ICC
Pain improvement 253 1.34 (1.36) 1.18 (1.41) −0.16 0.73 213 0.98 (1.20) 0.86 (1.22) −0.11 0.78
Impact summary 247 1.14 (1.25) 1.07 (1.28) −0.08 0.79 209 0.87 (1.06) 0.80 (1.09) −0.07 0.75
Treatment continuation 246 2.78 (1.25) 2.65 (1.36) −0.13 0.72 207 2.62 (1.25) 2.35 (1.40) −0.27 0.62
Treatment comparison 244 2.69 (0.92) 2.58 (0.98) −0.11 0.68 205 2.50 (0.85) 2.40 (0.95) −0.09 0.68

1Stable defined as <20% change on EQ-5D VAS score from week 8 to week 12.

2Stable defined as <20% change on BPI-DN item 5 from week 8 to week 12.

3Difference = week 12 mean − week 8 mean.

4Intraclass correlation coefficient.