Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e014235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014235

Table 4.

Cox regression analyses of the association between psychological distress and T2DM among different HKCDRS groups in traffic police officers

HKCDRS and psychological distress at baseline Sample size Cases HR (95% CI) for 4-year incidence of T2DM
Comparison 1 Comparison 2 Comparison 3 Comparison 4
HKCDRS 0–7, no psychological distress 632 24 Reference 1.75 (0.53 to 5.77) 0.26 (0.08 to 0.83) 0.14 (0.04 to 0.48)
HKCDRS 0–7, psychological distress 174 7 0.57 (0.17 to 1.88) Reference 0.45 (0.29 to 0.71) 0.54 (0.32 to 0.94)
HKCDRS>7, no psychological distress 620 56 2.20 (1.40 to 3.47) 3.86 (1.21 to 12.35) Reference 0.25 (0.13 to 0.45)
HKCDRS>7, psychological distress 157 19 4.05 (2.20 to 7.44) 7.09 (2.07 to 24.29) 1.84 (1.06 to 3.17) Reference

Alternative reference groups are shown in comparisons 1–4. Models are adjusted for marital status, education level, exercise activity, smoking, alcohol intake and working hours. All comparisons are based on the same data, but with a different reference group.

HKCDRS, Hong Kong Chinese Diabetes Risk Score; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.