Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 9;114(4):E570–E579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615422114

Fig. S4.

Fig. S4.

Effect of receptor-blocking antibodies on rotavirus infectivity and induction of OAS2 transcripts. (A) Stock aliquots of Ito-HRV were incubated with no antibody (control), the anti-type III IFN receptor-blocking antibody, or the anti-type I IFN system antibody mixture for 2 h. To assess the titer of HRV under these conditions, MA104 cells were infected with control Ito-HRV aliquots or antibody-treated Ito-HRV aliquots for 1 h, washed twice, and incubated overnight in DMEM for 18 h. Viral titer was subsequently obtained by FFA. (B) HIEs (j11) suspended in differentiation medium containing 0.5 mg/mL pancreatin were treated with or without blocking antibodies to the type III IFN receptor (anti-IL28RA) or the type I IFN system (anti-type 1 IFN mixture). After 1 h, 100 U/mL of IFN-λ1 or IFN-β1 was added to the HIEs. After 26 h, total RNA was extracted, and the transcriptional response was compared with HIE cultures that were neither antibody-treated nor IFN-treated. Transcript levels of the ISG OAS2 were first normalized to GAPDH levels, and the fold increase was calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Displayed above the bars is the percent reduction in OAS2 levels between the two groups being compared. Data in A and B are presented as geometric mean ± 95% CI of the geometric mean of three technical replicates. (C) HIEs (j3) were treated with or without blocking antibodies to the type III IFN receptor (anti-IL28RA) or the type I IFN system (anti-type 1 IFN mixture). After 2 h, HIEs were treated with 100 U/mL of IFN-λ1 or IFN-β1 for 24 h. After 24 h, HIEs were washed to remove the antibodies and IFN and inoculated with Ito-HRV (MOI of 0.1). The control samples consisted of HIEs which did not receive antibodies nor IFN before Ito-HRV infection. The increase in infectious virus was calculated by subtracting the titer at 1.5 hpi in the control infection from the titer at 24 hpi in each of the five test groups. Data from one representative experiment of two independent experiments is presented as arithmetic mean ± SEM of four technical replicates. Statistical analyses were performed by Mann–Whitney U test.