Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;13(1):44–52. doi: 10.1089/chi.2016.0122

Table 2.

Least-Squared Means (SE) for Infant Feeding Behaviors during Mother-Led and Infant-Led Conditions (n = 21)

  ML-Condition IL-Condition pa % DIFFb pc
Intake (mL) 148.1 (11.9) 131.6 (16.0) 0.32 41.8 (17.8) 0.03
Intake per kg body weight (mL/kg) 21.2 (1.9) 19.4 (2.5) 0.45 40.5 (18.1) 0.04
Meal duration (minutes) 9.2 (0.9) 10.9 (0.9) 0.15 −6.3 (10.5) 0.56
Rate of feeding (mL/min) 18.9 (2.5) 14.4 (1.7) 0.09 50.6 (18.5) 0.01
Number of satiation behaviors displayed during the second half of the meal 11.6 (1.3) 16.1 (1.2) 0.16 6.9 (21.8) 0.75
Latency to first satiation behavior (minutes) during the second half of the meal 5.9 (0.8) 6.3 (0.7) 0.62 −20.9 (18.1) 0.27
Duration of the second half of the meal (minutes) 5.3 (0.5) 6.1 (0.7) 0.38 −6.3 (10.5) 0.56
a

For the mean difference between the IL and the ML feeding; all models were controlled for time since last feeding and infant age.

b

Percent difference score, calculated as [(ML − IL)/IL] × 100.

c

For t-tests to determine whether the percent difference score was significantly different than zero.

% DIFF, percent difference score; IL, infant-led; ML, mother-led.