Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Procedia Food Sci. 2013 May 29;2:134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04.021

Table 2.

Perceptions and preferences of those using the ASA24 system among the participants who returned the evaluation (n=78).

Statementsa Strongly agree or agree No opinion Disagree or strongly disagree
graphic file with name nihms810479t6.jpg
I thought the ASA24 website was easy to understand.
 All participants that responded (n=59) 30 (51) 8 (14) 21 (36)
 Participants successfully accessing the ASA24 (n=36) 25 (69) 1 (3) 10 (28)

I preferred using the ASA24 compared to completing a dietary recall over the phone.
 All participants that responded (n=60) 19 (32) 12 (20) 29 (48)
 Participants successfully accessing the ASA24 (n=36) 17 (47) 3 (8) 16 (45)
a

Responses do not add up to 78 due to intentional skip patterns and missing responses

b

Percentages do not add up to 100 due to rounding.