Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Procedia Food Sci. 2013 May 29;2:134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.profoo.2013.04.021

Table 3.

Comparison of energy, selected nutrients, and energy adjusted nutrients between three telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recalls (RapidCalc) and one Automated Self-Administered 24-hour diet recall (ASA24) among participants generating nutrient values in the ASA24; n=37

Energy or nutrients RapidCalc ASA24 % Difference Pearson correlation coefficient 95% confidence interval from RapidCalc
mean±standard deviationa
Total energy (kcal) 1883±599** 1576±795 16 0.56*** [1683, 2083]
Protein (g) 79±24 71±44 10 0.57*** [71, 87]
Total fat (g) 75±29 67±41 11 0.45** [65, 85]
Cholesterol (mg) 255±133 258±213 −1 0.38* [211, 299]
Carbohydrate (g) 218±82** 171±97 22 0.54** [190, 245]
Dietary fiberb (g) 18.1±8.7* 14.6±8.7 19 0.47** [15.2, 21.0]
Calcium (mg) 645±313 547±318 15 0.38* [540, 749]
Sodium (mg) 2670±1156 2777±1590 −4 0.37* [2284, 3055]

Energy adjusted (nutrient/100 kcal):
Protein (g) 4.4±1.1 4.3±2.0 2.2 0.22 [4.0, 4.7]
Total fat (g) 4.0±0.77 4.2±2.0 −5 0.21 [3.7, 4.2]
Cholesterol (mg) 13.7±5.8 15.2±12.7 −10.9 0.19 [11.6, 15.2]
Carbohydrate (g) 11.5±2.1 11.1±4.2 3.5 0.41* [10.8, 12.3]
Dietary fiberb (g) 0.96±0.34 0.95±.62 1.0 0.26 [0.86, 1.10]
Calcium (mg) 35±15 37±19 −6 0.35* [30, 40]
Sodium (mg) 142±39* 173±61 −22 0.12 [129, 155]
a

Difference by paired t-test

b

Total dietary fiber

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001