Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;12:189–195. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S123985

Table 2.

Association between POMA score and univariate risk factors in older diabetic patients

Risk factor POMA
OR (95% CI) P-value
Age 7.707 (2.035–29.185) 0.003
Gender 0.918 (0.381–2.213) 0.849
BMI 1.200 (0.496–2.901) 0.686
History of falls 2.024 (0.802–5.108) 0.136
Walking aids 0.758 (0.219–2.624) 0.661
Fear of falling 0.520 (0.211–1.283) 0.159
Polypharmacy 1.625 (0.667–3.957) 0.285
Use of insulin 1.838 (0.713–4.737) 0.208
Diabetic complications score 6.667 (2.279–19.504) 0.001
HbA1c 0.918 (0.381–2.213) 0.847
FPG 0.618 (0.250–1.528) 0.297
TG 1.600 (0.500–5.125) 0.429
TC 0.429 (0.102–1.793) 0.246
LDL 0.411 (0.075–2.257) 0.306
ADL 11.700 (3.076–44.497) 0.000
IADL 16.286 (4.793–55.333) 0.000
MMSE 10.524 (2.764–40.075) 0.001
MNA-SF 2.769 (0.920–8.337) 0.070

Note: Each risk factor was analyzed by univariate logistic regression analysis.

Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; IADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MNA-SF, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form; OR, odds ratio; POMA, performance-oriented mobility assessment; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.