Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;12:175–187. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S111216

Table 3.

Efficacy and safety results (patients aged ≥75 years) in trials of NOACs for reduction in the risk of stroke in NVAF

Characteristic RE-LY
RE-LY
ROCKET AF
ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48
ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48
ARISTOTLE
AVERROES
Dabigatran 110 mg32 Dabigatran 150 mg32 Rivaroxaban 20 mg33,a Edoxaban 30 mg29,b Edoxaban 60 mg29,b Apixaban 5 mg27,34,c Apixaban 5 mg31,36,d
N (aged ≥75 years) 7,258 6,229 8,474 5,678 1,898
Comparator Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Warfarin, target INR 2.0–3.0 Aspirin 81–324 mg
Efficacy
 Stroke or SE 1.89 vs 2.14; RR: 0.88 (0.66–1.17) 1.43 vs 2.14; RR: 0.67 (0.49–0.90) 2.29 vs 2.85; HR: 0.80 (0.63–1.02) 2.55 vs 2.31 1.91 vs 2.31 1.56 vs 2.19; HR: 0.71 (0.53–0.95) 2.0 vs 6.1; HR: 0.33 (0.20–0.54)
 Stroke, SE, vascular death 5.27 vs 5.74; HR: 0.92 (0.78–1.087)
 Stroke, SE, MI, vascular death 6.07 vs 6.68; HR: 0.91 (0.78–1.06)
 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.34 vs 0.49; HR: 0.70 (0.39–1.25)
 Ischemic stroke 1.71 vs 1.95; HR: 0.88 (0.67–1.16) 1.6 vs 5.0; HR: 0.33 (0.18–0.56)
 Stroke (undetermined) 0.09 vs 0.16; HR: 0.55 (0.19–1.65)
 All-cause mortality 5.42 vs 5.97; HR: 0.91 (0.77–1.07) 5.6 vs 7.8; HR: 0.71 (0.50–0.99)
Safety
 Major bleeding 4.43 vs 4.37; RR: 1.01 (0.83–1.23) 5.10 vs 4.37; RR: 1.18 (0.98–1.42) 4.86 vs 4.40; HR: 1.11 (0.92–1.34) 2.26 vs 4.83 4.01 vs 4.83 3.33 vs 5.19; HR: 0.64 (0.52–0.79) 2.6 vs 2.2; HR: 1.21 (0.69–2.12)
 Hb drop 3.85 vs 2.98; HR: 1.29 (1.03–1.61)
Transfusion 2.28 vs 1.86; HR: 1.23 (0.93–1.64)
Clinical organ 1.07 vs 1.42; HR: 0.75 (0.52–1.08)
 Fatal bleeding 0.28 vs 0.61; HR: 0.45 (0.23–0.87)
 Intracranial hemorrhage 0.37 vs 1.00; RR: 0.37 (0.21–0.64) 0.41 vs 1.00; RR: 0.42 (0.25–0.70) 0.66 vs 0.83; HR: 0.80 (0.50–1.28) 0.43 vs 1.29; HR: 0.34 (0.20–0.57) 0.6 vs 0.7; HR: 0.84 (0.28–2.41)
 Major or CRNM bleeding 19.83 vs 17.55; HR: 1.13 (1.02–1.25) 6.7 vs 5.3; HR: 1.26 (0.88–1.80)
 GI bleeding 2.19 vs 1.59; RR: 1.39 (1.03–1.98) 2.80 vs 1.59; RR: 1.79 (1.35–2.37)
 Extracranial hemorrhage 4.10 vs 3.44; RR: 1.20 (0.97–1.48) 4.68 vs 3.44; RR: 1.39 (1.13–1.70)
Non-GI extracranial hemorrhage 2.00 vs 1.95; RR: 1.02 (0.76–1.36) 2.26 vs 1.95; RR: 1.16 (0.88–1.53)
 Any bleeding 23.5 vs 33.7; HR: 0.71 (0.65–0.78)
 Net clinical events 8.91 vs 10.9; HR: 0.82 (0.72–0.93)

Notes: All columns show NOAC vs warfarin except AVERROES, which compared apixaban vs aspirin. All data are presented as annual rates per 100 patients and RRs/HRs with 95% confidence intervals. Population numbers represent subjects in the total randomized population who were aged ≥75 years at baseline.

a

Fifteen milligrams daily for those with moderately impaired renal function (CrCl 30–49 mL/min). The 2,950 (20.7%) patients with CrCl 30–49 mL/min had a mean age of 79 years.62

b

For patients in either group, dose was halved if any of the following characteristics were present at the time of randomization or during the study: estimated CrCl 30–50 mL/min; body weight ≤60 kg; or the concomitant use of verapamil, quinidine, or dronedarone.

c

A reduced dose of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo was administered in 790 patients ≥75 years of age (13.9% of patients ≥75 years).

d

A reduced dose of apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) was used throughout the study for patients who met two of the following criteria: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L). A total of 6% of the patients in the apixaban group and 7% in the aspirin group received 2.5 mg twice a day according to protocol. A daily dose of 81 mg of aspirin or aspirin placebo was used in 65% of patients in the apixaban group and 64% in the aspirin group.

Abbreviations: ARISTOTLE, Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation; AVERROES, Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid [ASA] to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Have Failed or Are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CRNM, clinically relevant nonmajor; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation – Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation; HR, hazard ratio; INR, international normalized ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; NVAF, non-valvular atrial fibrillation; RE-LY, Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy; ROCKET AF, Rivaroxaban Once-Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation; RR, relative risk; SE, systemic embolism.