Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;59(4):862–870. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0170

Table 1.

Effects of different training type by test type, presented in gain in percentage points (and SD).


MOST OVERLAP


Test ST group MT group Control group
Single-Talker 4AFC test 17.8 * (10.2) +++ 11.6* (10.9) 2.8 (7.3)
Multi-Talker 4AFC test 11.4 * (12.5) ++ 14.7 * (10.5) ++ 5.7 (13.1)
Novel-Talker 4AFC test 10.7* (10.5)+ 8.0* (12.0)+ 7.2* (10.4)+
Iowa Sentences test 1.4 (10.5) −0.9 (8.3) −2.5 (7.5)
LEAST OVERLAP

Note. Bolded results indicate the findings for which a significant difference between the groups could be found. Plus signs (+, ++, +++) highlight the increased degree of overlap: more plus signs reflect greater overlap. ST = Single-Talker; MT = Multi-Talker; 4AFC = four-choice discrimination task.

*

Statistically significant differences.