Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Aug 20;41(2):198–207. doi: 10.1177/0148607116661838

Table 2.

Gut Microbiota Profile: Odds of a Sample Testing Positive.a

Gut Bacteria n EN vs PN
OA vs PN
EN vs OA
OR (95% CI) P Value OR (95% CI) P Value OR (95% CI) P Value
Phylum level
 Actinobacteria 4 DNC
 Bacteroidetes 123 0.09 (0.03–0.3) .001   0.1 (0.04–0.3) .001   0.9 (0.3–2.6) .82
 Proteobacteria 3 DNC
 Unclassified bacteria 8 DNC
Family level
 Unclassified Actinobacteria 4 DNC
 Bacteroidaceae 41 0.43 (0.04–4.2) .41 1.02 (0.1–8.0) .98 0.42 (0.05–3.6) .37
 Porphyromonadaceae 59 0.05 (0.01–0.3) .007 0.02 (0.003–0.2) .003 2.16 (0.2–20.2) .44
 Unclassified Bacteroidetes 11 DNC
 Clostridiaceae 7 DNC
 Lachnospiraceae 76 1.47 (0.4–5.6) .52 0.72 (0.2–2.6) .57 2.04 (0.6–7.2) .23
 Campylobacteraceae 3 DNC

CI, confidence interval; DNC, did not converge; EN, enteral nutrition; OA, oleanolic acid; OR, odds ratio; PN, parenteral nutrition.

a

Note increase in phylum Bacteroidetes and family Porphyromonadaceae with parenteral nutrition.