Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2016 Oct 24;17(1):1–5. doi: 10.1037/emo0000235

Table 2.

Results of Regression Analyses Predicting End-Term Adjustment from Prior Homesickness Level and Trajectory

Model 1 Model 2
Homesickness intercept Homesickness slope Homesickness intercept x slope Homesickness intercept Homesickness slope Homesickness intercept x slope Baseline adjustment
Overall college adjustment −.36 (.10)**
[−.55, −.16]
1.00 (1.07)
[−1.11, 3.11]
−.08 (1.01)
[−2.07, 1.91]
−.38 (.10)**
[−.57, −.19]
.63 (1.04)
[−1.43, 2.70]
.17 (.98)
[−1.77, 2.11]
.21 (.07)**
[.08, .34]
Social adjustment −.34 (.11)**
[−.56, −.12]
−.61 (1.21)
[−2.99, 1.78]
−.44 (1.14)
[−2.68, 1.81]
−.38 (.11)**
[−.60, −.16]
−.79 (1.17)
[−3.09, 1.52]
.23 (1.12)
[−1.98, 2.44]
.23 (.07)**
[.09, .37]
Academic adjustment .06 (.09)
[−.11, .23]
2.21 (.98)*
[.27, 4.15]
−1.16 (.92)
[−2.98, .65]
.07 (.08)
[−.09, .24]
2.05 (.95)*
[.17, 3.93]
−.68 (.90)
[−2.46, 1.10]
.29 (.08)**
[.13, .45]

Note. Unstandardized coefficients are presented with standard errors in parentheses. 95% CIs are listed in brackets. Model 1 included individual homesickness intercept and slope estimates, the interaction between intercept and slope, negative emotional experience, and dummy variables for sex (1 = female, 0 = male) and race (1 = European-American, 0 = not European-American). Model 2 included a pre-college assessment of the criterion variable as an additional predictor.

p < .10

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.