Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;33(1):116–120. doi: 10.1007/s12288-016-0660-4

Table 2.

Test accuracy for detecting bacterial contamination by glucose and pH screening test

Screening test True positive True negative False positive False negative Accuracy, % (95 % CI) Sensitivity, % (95 % CI) Specificity, % (95 % CI) PPV, % (95 % CI) NPV, % (95 % CI) PLR (95 % CI) NLR (95 % CI)
Glucose alone 3 1282 25 22 96 (95–97) 12 (4–30) 98 (97–99) 11 (4–27) 98 (97–99) 6.27 (.05–817.2) .90 (.82–.98)
pH screening 6 1089 218 19 82 (80–84) 24 (12–43) 83 (81–85) 3 (1–6) 98 (97–99) 1.44 (.51–4.09) .91 (.82–1.01)
Both glucose and pH 3 1284 22 22 97 (96–98) 12 (4–30) 98 (97–99) 12 (4–30) 98 (97–99) 7.12 (.05–937.9) .90 (.82–.98)
Glucose and or pH (at least one of them) 6 1086 220 19 82 (80–84) 24 (12–43) 83 (81–85) 3 (1–6) 98 (97–99) 1.43 (.50–4.04) .91 (.82–1.01)

PPV indicated positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, PLR positive likelihood ratio, NLR negative likelihood ratio

* For one of the platelet concentrates, bacterial contamination base on Bact/Alert system was missing