Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;52(2):218–228. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1230-0

Table 3.

ROC curve analysis of the data on WFA-sialylated MUC1, CA19-9, and CEA levels in the serum and bile samples

Serum Sensitivity Specificity AUC Cut-off value
% %
WFA-sialylated MUC1 µL/mL
 Control vs. BTC/IhCC 89.8 88.6 0.963 175.4
 Benign biliary disease vs. BTC/IhCC 77.6 78.0 0.873 214.2
CA19-9 U/mL
 Control vs. BTC/IhCC 78.5 86.4 0.857 16.5
 Benign biliary disease vs. BTC/IhCC 71.3 71.1 0.753 27.6
CEA ng/mL
 Control vs. BTC/IhCC 76.0 72.7 0.767 1.6
 Benign biliary disease vs. BTC/IhCC 46.2 55.4 0.523 2.8
Bile % %
WFA-sialylated MUC1 nL/µg protein
 Benign biliary disease vs. BTC/IhCC 86.3 76.5 0.896 13.5
CA19-9 U/µg protein
 Benign biliary disease vs. BTC/IhCC 68.9 60.0 0.690 1651

WFA Wisteria floribunda agglutinin, MUC1 mucin core polypeptide 1, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, BTC biliary tract carcinoma, IhCC intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma