Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 31;7:41719. doi: 10.1038/srep41719

Table 1. Summary of the RAS analysis in this study with corresponding ELISpot responses.

Participant HCV Genotype Substitution detected RAS outcomea Positionb Reversion CD8 T cell epitope analysis
Epitope sequence HLA Result (SFU/106 PBMC)c Time-point (DPI)d
Ch_086MX 1a A421V Gain 2841 No 2841ARMVMMTHF2849 HLA-B27:05 25 72
Ch_485FX 1b V499A Gain 2918 No 2913GVPPLRVWR2921 HLA-A01:01 Negative 79
    S556G Loss 2975 Yes
Cl_277 3a M414T Gain 2844 No 2838WLGNIIMYA2846 HLA-A02:01 45 116
Ch_240 3a P496S Loss 2926 Yes
Cl_686FX 1a A553V Gain/Loss 2973 Yes 2967LSGWFTAGY2975 HLA-A01:01 Negative 117
    S556G Gain/Loss 2976 Yes

aRAS; resistance-associated substitution. Gain or loss or RAS is determined longitudinally with reference to the earliest sample.

bAmino acid position with reference to strain H77 (AF009606) for GT1a, Con1 (AJ238799) for GT1b, and NZL1 (D17763) for GT3a.

cSpot-forming units per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

dEstimated days post infection (DPI) at which analysis was performed.