Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 31;17:8. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0403-9

Table 1.

Outcomes of fornix reconstruction

No. of eyes Complete success n (%) Partial success n (%) Failure n (%) P value
Total 80 40 (50.0) 25 (31.3) 15 (18.8)
Cause
 Thermal 44 18 (40.9) 13 (29.5) 13 (29.5) 0.020
 Chemical 36 22 (61.1) 12 (33.3) 2 (5.6)
Grade of symblepharon length
 Grade I/II 20 17 (85.0) 2 (10.0) 1 (5.0) 0.001
 Grade III 33 17 (51.5) 10 (30.3) 6 (18.2)
 Grade IV 27 6 (22.2) 13 (48.1) 8 (29.6)
Grade of symblepharon width
 Grade a 20 12 (60.0) 1 (5.0) 7 (35.0) 0.019
 Grade b 27 15 (55.6) 9 (33.3) 3 (11.1)
 Grade c 33 13 (39.4) 15 (45.5) 5 (15.2)
Preoperative inflammation
 ≤1+ 54 34 (63.0) 16 (29.6) 4 (7.4) <0.001
 ≥2+ 26 6 (23.1) 9 (34.6) 11 (42.3)
Loss of normalcorneal limbal morphology
 ≤3 quadrants 23 12 (52.2) 4 (17.4) 7 (30.4) 0.113
 4 quadrants 57 28 (49.1) 21 (36.8) 8 (19.0)
Time for surgery
 ≤6 months 19 7 (36.8) 8 (42.1) 4 (21.1) 0.392
 >6 months 61 33 (54.1) 17 (27.9) 11 (18.0)