Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 31;17:84. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3082-2

Table 1.

Associations of extent of mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk by levels of benign histologic impression

Low Density Medium Density High Density p-valuea
Characteristic N Obs Exp SIR (95% CI) N Obs Exp SIR (95% CI) N Obs Exp SIR (95% CI)
Histologic Impression
 NP 699 30 40.07 0.75 (0.50, 1.07) 1586 99 80.27 1.23 (1.00, 1.50) 1247 95 56.69 1.68 (1.36, 2.05) <0.001
 PDWA 364 31 22.15 1.40 (0.95, 1.99) 1104 113 58.76 1.92 (1.58, 2.31) 801 78 43.50 1.79 (1.42, 2.24) 0.27
 AH 69 12 3.53 3.40 (1.76, 5.93) 231 41 11.77 3.48 (2.50, 4.73) 170 29 8.92 3.25 (2.18, 4.67) 0.96

Standardized incidence ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals, comparing the observed number of breast cancer events to those expected based on incidence rates from Iowa SEER data. Analyses account for the effects of age and calendar period

NP non-proliferative disease, PDWA proliferative disease without atypia, AH atypical hyperplasia, N number of individuals, Obs observed number of breast cancer events, Exp expected number of breast cancer events, SIR standardized incidence ratio, CI confidence interval

a P-value, test of heterogeneity in SIRs across columns