Table 6.
The distribution and the percentage of FMD serotypes of positive samples collected from SR and LR for age group less than one year.
| Branches | Species | No. of Positive Samples | Serotype No. (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | A | O,A | No serotype | |||
| Green Mountain | SR | 2 | 2 (100) | |||
| LR | 6 | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | |||
| Benghazi | SR | 15 | 12 (80.0) | 2 (13.3) | 1 (6.7) | |
| LR | 0 | |||||
| Middle Area | SR | 1 | 1 (100) | |||
| LR | 0 | |||||
| Zawiyah | SR | 0 | ||||
| LR | 2 | 2 (100.0) | ||||
| Tripoli | SR | 3 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| LR | 10 | 5 (50.0) | 2 (20.0) | 3 (30.0) | ||
| West Mountain | SR | 6 | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| LR | 1 | 1 (100.0) | ||||
| Sabha | SR | 3 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| LR | 0 | |||||
| Over All | SR | 30 | 19 (63.3) | 9 (30.0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) |
| LR | 19 | 10 (52.6) | 6 (31.6) | 3 (15.8) | ||
SAT-2 results were not included in the table due to that the two SAT2-positive results can be explained as cross-reactivity of type O-antibody with SAT-2 antigens.