Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):1–11. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v7i1.1

Table 7.

The correlation between the sero-prevalence of FMD and the number of SR and LR in 40 cities.

% of FMD in SR # of the LR # of the SR
% of FMD in LR Pearson Correlation .171 .386* .632**
P-Value .437 .042 .000
N 23 28 28

% of FMD in SR Pearson Correlation 1 -.020 -.043
P-Value .911 .803
N 35 36

# of the LR Pearson Correlation 1 .479**
P-Value .002
N 40
*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).