Table 7.
The correlation between the sero-prevalence of FMD and the number of SR and LR in 40 cities.
| % of FMD in SR | # of the LR | # of the SR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of FMD in LR | Pearson Correlation | .171 | .386* | .632** |
| P-Value | .437 | .042 | .000 | |
| N | 23 | 28 | 28 | |
| % of FMD in SR | Pearson Correlation | 1 | -.020 | -.043 |
| P-Value | .911 | .803 | ||
| N | 35 | 36 | ||
| # of the LR | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .479** | |
| P-Value | .002 | |||
| N | 40 | |||
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).