Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Mar 19;28(7):1094–1103. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12812

Table 2.

Comparison of thermal pain sensitivity, conditioned pain modulation, and upper GI visceral sensitivity in women with IBS compared to HC

HC vs IBS IBS Subgroups


HC
n = 31
IBS
n = 46
pa IBS-CM
n = 22
IBS-D
n = 24
pb pc p d
Thermal pain sensitivity
  45 °C 3.8 (2.4) 3.5 (2.0) NS 4.2 (2.1) 2.9 (1.6) NS .165 .171
  46 °C 4.2 (2.7) 4.3 (2.3) NS 5.3 (2.3) 3.3 (1.7) .121 NS .005
  47 °C 5.3 (2.5) 5.4 (2.4) NS 6.4 (2.3) 4.5 (2.2) .141 NS .011
  48 °C 6.3 (2.4) 6.7 (2.2) NS 7.5 (2.1) 5.9 (2.0) .079 NS .011
CPM efficiency score 1.1 (1.3) 0.9 (1.1) NS .8 1.1 (0.9) NS NS .096
Visceral Pain Sensitivity
  Pain/discomfort 15.4 (17.5) 26.9 (16.0) .001 31.9 (16.9) 22.3 (14.4) .001 .016 .039
  Bloating 20.6 (21.7) 34.6 (20.3) .003 38.9 (20.9) 30.8 (19.0) .003 .039 .187
  Fullness 35.3 (19.9) 44.6 (17.4) .050 50.0 (16.7) 39.7 (16.8) .006 NS .014
  Nausea 12.5 (19.1) 22.9 (20.3) .003 24.2 (20.7) 21.7 (20.3) .005 .024 NS

Note: IBS = irritable bowel syndrome. HC = healthy controls. IBS-CM = Constipation- and Mixed-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) group. IBS-D = Diarrhea-predominant IBS group. CPM = conditioned pain modulation.

P values were determined using Mann–Whitney test.

pa= 2 group comparison of IBS vs. HC; pb = IBS-CM vs. HC; pc = IBS-D vs. HC; pd = IBS-CM vs. IBS-D. NS = non-significant (p > .20).