Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2016 Nov 24;98:52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.11.003

Table 5.

Blinded video analyses of abnormal movements in preweanling Sgcem+/pGt mice and WT littermates at P14 and P16.

Sex, Genotypes (numbers, age) Total scorea (mean ± SEM) Number of genotype-phenotype matchesb Percent correct
M, WT (n=5, P14) 1.7 ± 1.2 4/5 80.0
M, Sgcem+/pGt (n=5, P14) 8.3 ± 3.3* 5/5 100.0
M, WT (n=10, P16) 18.7 ± 4.7 22/30 73.3
M, Sgcem+/pGt (n=10, P16) 36.0 ± 5.3* 18/30 60.0
F, WT (n=10, P16) 20.0 ± 8.1 23/30 76.7
F, Sgcem+/pGt (n=10, P16) 39.0 ± 10.4* 22/30 73.3
a

Mean total scores for abnormal movements were generated by three blinded raters.

b

Genotype-phenotype matches were declared if ≥ 2/3 of the raters scored the presence of abnormal movements in Sgcem+/pGt mice or if ≤ 1/3 scored abnormal movements in WT littermates.

*

p < 0.05.