Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Haemophilia. 2016 Jul;22(Suppl 3):31–40. doi: 10.1111/hae.13000

Table 2.

Risk of bias summary by non-randomized comparative study assessed by the ACROBAT-NRSI tool.

Study Bias due to
confounding
Bias in selection
of participants
into the study
Bias in
measurement
of interventions
Bias due to
departures
intended
interventions
Bias due
to missing
data
Bias in
measurement
of outcomes
Bias in selection
of reported results
Arnold 2014 [48] Moderate risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Lazerson 1972 [26] Serious risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Serious risk Low risk Low risk
Monahan 2011 [28] Moderate risk Moderate risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Smith 1982 [39] Serious risk Moderate risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Low risk
Smith 1984 [27] Serious risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Low risk
Soucie 2000 [18] Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Soucie 2001 [38] Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Soucie 2004 [46] Moderate risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk