. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Sex Res Social Policy. 2016 Apr 2;14(1):100–111. doi: 10.1007/s13178-016-0228-y

Table 5.

Logistic Regression Results

	Positive Intrapersonal	Positive Intrapersonal	Negative Intrapersonal	Negative Intrapersonal
R²	.22^***	.17^***	.14^***	.13^***

Odds Ratios
Gender	0.81	1.40	0.36^***	0.10
Partner Type	4.07^**	3.40^**	0.76	0.27^***
Kissing Only	0.17^*	0.46	0.24^**	1.29
Kissing and Touching	1.43	1.03	0.60	1.52
Kissing Only X Partner Type	1.13	1.77	1.30	4.95⁺
Kissing Only X Gender	3.22	3.55	0.91	1.82
Kissing and Touching X Partner Type	5.96	1.37	1.40	4.73⁺
Kissing and Touching X Gender	2.54	1.72	1.15	0.53

Notes:

⁺

p < .10

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001.

Gender: Female = 0, Male = 1; Centered values used in regression: Male = −.43, Female = .57 Partner Type: Nonromantic = 0, Romantic = 1; Centered values used in regression: Nonromantic = .31, Romantic = −.69