Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Multicult Couns Devel. 2016 Oct 3;44(4):245–262. doi: 10.1002/jmcd.12052

TABLE 1.

Summary of Domains, Frequencies, and Core Ideas of Responses by Assessors

Domain and Frequency Core Ideas
Recruitment process
  General Effective recruitment strategies and locations
Participant referral was best recruitment method
Indecision about participating
Stigma did not affect recruitment
  Typical Recruitment challenges
Ineffective recruitment strategies and locations
Participants interested in cash incentive method
  Variant Recruitment strategies and locations specifically for recent
immigrants to the United States
Improving incentives
Concerns about parents/family members learning about participation
More communication needed across recruitment team
Importance of familiar contact person(s)
Assessment process
  General Little observed differences in within-Latino dialects or cultural
issues
Perceived trust
Sensitive topics were not challenging
Interview scheduling cited as a barrier
Importance of interview location
Establishing rapport and normalizing responses
Length of survey
  Variant Inhibition/embarrassment about sensitive questions
Observations about biological testing
Importance of interviewer preparation and training
Few participants refused to be recorded
Need for clarification because of participants’ education and
language

Note. N = 4. General = applicable to all cases; Typical = applicable to three cases; Variant = applicable to one or two cases.