Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Aug 26;72(2 Pt 1):021911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.021911

FIG. 16.

FIG. 16

Coherence function for model B, with fL = 0 and fC = 0.3 (top) and fC = 2.1 (bottom). Other parameters are α = 0.015625, D = 0.2. Simulation results are for Nreal = 103 stochastic realizations of the spike train and stimulus, with a time step of Δt = 5 ×10−3; 2 ×1021 time steps were used. The coherences according to theory I and II are shown as a dashed and a solid line, respectively. The two theories do not differ much for fC = 0.3 but yield large differences for a high-cutoff frequency fC = 2.1, in particular, in the frequency band around the eigenfrequency of the neuron f ≈ 1. Again the difference in coherence between the two theories is not that large if looked at on a linear scale (inset, bottom).