Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Aug 26;72(2 Pt 1):021911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.021911

FIG. 17.

FIG. 17

Mutual information rate as a function of the cutoff frequency, with fL = 0. Other parameters are α= 0.015 625, D = 0.2. Simulation results (small black symbols) are for Nreal = 103 stochastic realizations of the spike train and stimulus, with a time step of Δt = 2 ×10−2. 2 ×1021 time steps were used for model A (upper traces), and 2 ×1018 for model B (lower traces). We also show the simulation results from Ref. [13] (squares, diamonds, circles) that were obtained using a different numerical scheme (see text). Also shown are the theories I (dashed lines) and II (solid lines) as well as the difference ℳA – ℳB between the mutual information rates of model A and B.