Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Health Place. 2017 Jan 4;43:151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.12.004

Table 2.

Adjusted incidence rate ratios from zero-inflated Poisson models for the proportion of EMA responses in which participants reported consuming alcohol and problem behaviors

Alcohol Consumptiona Problem Behaviorsb
IRR (95% CI) p-value IRR (95% CI) p-value
Observed disorganization 2.42 2.09 2.81 < 0.001 2.87 1.63 5.07 < 0.001
Objective indicators of
  disorganization
  (standardized)
1.25 1.10 1.41 0.001 0.98 0.64 1.49 0.910
Observed alcohol outlets 1.05 0.69 1.61 0.813 3.31 0.61 18.01 0.167
Objectively measured alcohol
  outlets (50m)
0.28 0.03 2.41 0.248 1.70 0.02 145.25 0.815
Objectively measured alcohol
  outlets (100m)
3.45 2.12 5.63 < 0.001 1.49 0.20 10.87 0.696
Objectively measured alcohol
  outlets (200m)
2.56 1.95 3.35 < 0.001 0.92 0.24 3.62 0.910

All models adjusted for participant sex, age, and race/ethnicity; italicized estimates denote p < 0.05; Vuong tests positive with p > 0.05 for all models

a

Alcohol consumption models account for zero-inflation according to alcohol use in baseline survey

a

Problem behaviors models account for zero-inflation according to problem behaviors in baseline survey