Table 3.

Linear probability models of partnership and mobility (2003–2007)

	Partnership:		Mobility:
	Model I	Model II	Model I
Age	0.07***	0.05***	-0.06***
	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.01)
Age squared	-0.001***	-0.0004***	0.001***
	(0.00001)	(0.00001)	(0.00005)
Female	-0.06***	-0.12***	0.009***
	(0.003)	(0.004)	(0.002)
Prop. total QOF points	-	-	-0.0004***
			(0.0001)
FTE	0.003***	0.001***	0.001***
	(0.0001)	(0.00004)	(0.0001)
Distance to the best practice	0.0001	-0.00006	-0.00004
	(0.0001)	(0.00003)	(0.00004)
Total population	0.009	0.002***	-0.002***
	(0.001)	(0.0004)	(0.0002)
LISI	-0.0003	-0.001***	0.001***
	(0.0002)	(0.0002)	(0.0002)
Proportion female 65-74	0.01***	0.004**	-0.001
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.002)
Proportion female 75+	0.004	0.002**	-0.003***
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.001)
Proportion male 65-74	-0.001**	-0.0004	0.003
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.002)
Proportion male 75+	-0.01*	-0.0001	0.003*
	(0.003)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Practice years	0.002***	0.002***	-0.001***
	(0.0003)	(0.0003)	(0.0002)
Practice size	-0.02***	-0.01***	-0.002***
	(0.001)	(0.0004)	(0.001)
2004	-0.04***	-0.01***	0.02***
	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.003)
2005	-0.06***	-0.01***	0.02***
	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.002)
2006	-0.12***	-0.06***	0.03***
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.002)
2007	-0.15	-0.07***	-
	(0.003)	(0.002)
Inverse Mills’ ratio	-	-	-0.04
			(0.05)
Constant	-1.18***	-0.55***	1.60***
	(0.03)	(0.02)	(0.02)
N. observations	141,529	141,529	141,529
N. practices	8507	8507	8507

Note: Model I is a pooled linear regression and Model II is a random intercept multilevel model

Model I of Mobility is second stage of Heckman model

^∗∗∗ p<0.01; ^∗∗ p<0.05; ^∗ p<0.10