Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2016 Oct 27;152(3):598–607.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.026

Table 2.

Diagnostic test characteristics of TE and MRE for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis

Overall N=94 AUROC (95% CI) Threshold
(kPa)
Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
PPV
(%)
NPV
(%)
TE vs MRE
(p)*
Primary analysis
Stage 1-4 (n=51)
versus
stage 0 (n=43)
MRE 0.82 (0.74-0.91) 2.65 76.5 79.1 81.3 73.9
TE 0.67 (0.56-0.78) 6.10 66.7 65.1 69.4 62.2 0.0116
Secondary analyses
Stage 2-4 (n=29)
versus
stage 0-1 (n=65)
MRE 0.89 (0.83-0.96) 2.86 79.3 81.8 65.7 89.8
TE 0.86 (0.77-0.95) 6.90 79.3 84.6 69.7 90.2 0.4596
Stage 3-4 (n=18)
versus
stage 0-2 (n=76)
MRE 0.87 (0.78-0.96) 2.99 77.8 80.3 48.3 93.8
TE 0.80 (0.67-0.93) 7.30 77.8 77.6 45.2 93.7 0.1942
Stage 4 (n=8)
versus
stage 0-3 (n=86)
MRE 0.87 (0.71-1.00) 3.35 75.0 81.4 27.3 97.2
TE 0.69 (0.45-0.94) 6.90 62.5 66.3 14.7 95.0 0.0546
NASH (n=72)
versus
no NASH (n=22)
MRE 0.70 (0.57-0.82) 2.53 63.9 68.2 86.8 36.6
TE 0.35 (0.22-0.49) 5.60 61.1 59.1 83.0 31.7 0.0011
*

p value: AUROC of TE versus MRE via Delong Test

AUROC: Area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: Confidence interval; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value