Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 5;55(1):27–34. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0032

Table 6. Comparison of OTM lifting capacity. The one time per 8 hour lifting frequency applied in the Ciriello and Snook (1983) and Snook and Ciriello (1991) is equivalent to the OTM in other researches. The mark “—” in the table indicates “Not applicable”.

Tasksa This study
(Squat)
This study
(Stoop)
Lee and Chen
(1996)
Lee et al.
(1995)
Ciriello and Snook
(1983)
Snook and Ciriello
(1991)
FK36M
FK48M
FK31MT1
FK31MT2
FK31MT3
FK31MT4
FK31MT5
FS36M
FS48M
FS31MT1
FS31MT2
FS31MT3
FS31MT4
FS31MT5


30.4 (5.6)b
34.3 (3.7)
33.6 (4.6)
32.2 (4.5)
31.5 (4.9)


21.0 (3.1)
25.4 (3.7)
26.5 (4.1)
25.8 (4.3)
24.7 (4.2)


31.9 (7.7)
34.9 (5.3)
34.7 (6.5)
32.7 (5.0)
30.4 (4.8)


21.3 (3.8)
26.5 (4.7)
27.0 (4.5)
25.5 (4.2)
24.8 (3.9)
41.27 (4.92)
34.92 (3.83)





32.63 (3.59)
28.86 (3.98)




40.48 (8.90)






31.96 (4.96)





61.0 (16.3)












44.0
38.0











a: There is 5 to 7 digits in the task code. The first two digits represent the lifting height, FK for floor to knuckle and FS for floor to shoulder. The third and fourth digits represent the box width in cm. The fifth digit, M, means the lifting frequency is OTM. And the last two digits represent the lifting duration in this study. T1 means the duration is one second. Similar notations are used for other durations.

b: Standard deviation.