Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2016 Dec 7;135(5):426–439. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024825

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Classification of diastolic measures in the overall ARIC study sample free of prevalent HF using ARIC-based reference limits compared to guideline-based cutpoints. Panel A: Prevalence of abnormal diastolic measures (TDI e’, E/e’, LAVi) by ARIC-based reference limits and guideline-based cutpoints in the overall study sample. Panel B: Prevalence of participant categories based on number of abnormal diastolic measures (TDI e’, E/e’, LAVi) and associated rates of incident HF hospitalization or death using either ARIC-based reference limits or guideline-based cutpoints.