Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;4(2):120–127. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30002-0

Table 2.

MFQ clinical cutoff point at T3 predicted by propensity score weighted mental health service contact at T1

Propensity score weighted only* Propensity score weighted and adjusted for post-baseline confounds Post-baseline confounds
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value

Adolescents with a T1 mental disorder: service contact vs none
Full propensity score sample (n=119) 3·70 (1·40–9·82) 0·0086 5·23 (1·47–18·63) 0·011 T2 MFQ; T3 family dysfunction, stressful life events
Common support sample (n=98) 4·36 (1·41–13·47) 0·011 7·38 (1·73–31·50) 0·0069 T2 MFQ; T3 stressful life events, family dysfunction, living with biological parents
All with T1 mental health service contact vs T1 mental disorder but no services
Full propensity score sample (n=134) 1·78 (0·81–3·92) 0·15 2·41 (0·92–6·32) 0·073 T1 MFQ; mental health service contact after T1; T2 friendships; T3 stressful life events, living with biological parents
Common support sample (n=94) 2·36 (0·93–6·02) 0·072 2·65 (0·88–7·97) 0·085 T1 MFQ; mental health service contact after T1; T3 stressful life events, living with biological parents, family dysfunction

OR=odds ratio. T1=timepoint 1 (age 14·5 years). T2=timepoint 2 (age 16 years). MFQ=Mood and Feelings Questionnaire. T3=timepoint 3 (age 17·5 years).

*

Variables used in the propensity score model are ethnic origin, gender, pubertal status, mental health referrals aged 0–13 years, past Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children diagnosis, current behavioural diagnosis, and environmental factors (current friendships and family dysfunction, past-year stressful life events).

T1 MFQ was used if more strongly related to predictor and outcome than T2 MFQ.