Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;7:41196. doi: 10.1038/srep41196

Table 1. The relationship between the prevalence of C. difficile in lawn and the age of the lawn, its size, sampling site, location, postcode, and season in Perth.

Variable Variable categories C. difficile number isolated (%) Univariable model Covariate Odds ratios (95% CI)*
Odds ratios (95% CI) Sampling site P value
Age Old lawn (n = 113) 53 (47) Referent    
  New lawn (n = 198) 129 (65) 2.11 (1.32–3.4) 2.30 (1.16–4.57) 0.015#
Area Extra-large (n = 85) 53 (62) Referent    
  Large (n = 53) 26 (49) 0.58 (0.28–1.16) 0.49 (0.16–1.49) 0.7
  Medium (n = 101) 60 (59) 0.88 (0.49–1.59) 1.02 (0.42–2.51) 0.7
  Small (n = 72) 43 (60) 0.89 (0.47–1.71) 0.88 (0.32–2.43) 0.7
Location North (n = 161) 98 (60.9) Referent    
  South (n = 150) 84 (56) 1.22 (0.78–1.92) 1.25 (0.61–2.59) 0.99
Season Autumn (n = 224) 135 (60.3) Referent    
  Winter (n = 87) 47 (54) 0.77 (0.47–1.28) 0.67 (0.28–1.62) 0.52

*CI; The 95% confidence interval of odds ratio for the covariate estimates.

CI; The 95% confidence interval of odds ratio for the univariate estimates.

Age of lawn; new lawn ≤4 months, old lawn >4 months.

P values are based on likelihood ratios and P < 0.05 was considered significant#.

Univariable logistic regression model with random effect (site of sampling and postcode). The random effect term for postcode was not included in all the models because its addition or removal did not change the model estimates significantly.