Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;7:41064. doi: 10.1038/srep41064

Table 4. Comparison between morphological phenotype, genotype, grading and survival.

Morphological phenotype Conventional ductal adenocarcinoma (without components) (A1) Combined ductal adenocarcinoma (with additional components) (A2) Variants (B)
N 91 72 14
KRAS
 Wildtype 7 3 3
 Mutated 84 69 11
p-value A1 vs A21 0.35    
p-value A vs B1 0.035    
CDKN2A/p16
 Intact 29 11 3
 Altered 62 60 11
p-value A1 vs A21 0.016    
p-value A vs B1 0.78    
TP53
 Intact 22 11 5
 Altered 69 61 9
p-value A1 vs A21 0.16    
p-value A vs B1 0.17    
SMAD4
 Intact 57 45 10
 Altered 34 27 4
p-value A1 vs A21 0.98    
p-value A vs B1 0.51    
Number of mutations
 0 0 0 1
 1 5 1 2
 2 30 14 3
 3 40 40 5
 4 16 17 3
p-value A1 vs A21 0.09    
p-value A vs B1 0.004    
Pathologic stage
Primary tumour
 T1 2 2 0
 T2 3 8 0
 T3 74 55 14
 T4 12 7 0
p-value A1 vs A21 0.23    
p-value A vs B1 0.55    
Nodal status
 N0 24 22 7
 N1 67 50 7
p-value A1 vs A21 0.60    
p-value A vs B1 0.12    
Grading
 G1 7 1 5
 G2 4 27 6
 G3 44 44 3
p-value A1 vs A21 0.08    
p-value A vs B1 <0.001    
Survival
(months) 22.7 15.5 34.1
p-value A1 vs A22 0.07    
p-value A vs B2 0.06    

1 Chi2-test/Fisher’s exact test, 2Log-rank-test.