Table 1.
LIRA3 | N = 14 | LIRA1.2 + MET2000 | N = 14 | Comparison of pretreatment values between groups | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | Pretreatment | Post treatment | P a | Pretreatment | Post treatment | P a | P b |
Age (years) | 34.6 ± 6.1 | 31.6 ± 5.9 | 0.164 | ||||
Weight (kg) | 111.1 ± 14.8 | 104.7 ± 14.8 | 0.001 | 102.5 ± 9 | 98.9 ± 10.3 | 0.002 | 0.137 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 39.2 ± 5.5 | 37.0 ± 5.5 | 0.001 | 37.5 ± 5.3 | 36.2 ± 5.5 | 0.002 | 0.482 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 110.1 ± 12 | 105.9 ± 12.8 | 0.003 | 105.2 ± 10.7 | 103.0 ± 8.2 | 0.113 | 0.265 |
Androstenedione (nmol/l) | 7.0 ± 3.7 | 7.7 ± 3.4 | 0.451 | 10.6 ± 6.4 | 8.6 ± 3.5 | 0.530 | 0.094 |
Total testosterone (nmol/l) | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.065 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 0.023 | 0.125 |
Free testosterone (pmol/l) | 9.1 ± 5.1 | 9.7 ± 3.8 | 0.594 | 11.7 ± 5.7 | 11.0 ± 4.2 | 0.660 | 0.164 |
SHBG (nmol/l) | 39.6 ± 41.4 | 46.9 ± 54.5 | 0.018 | 27.7 ± 21.1 | 47.2 ± 90.4 | 0.430 | 0.137 |
Glu 0 min OGTT (mmol/l) | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 0.341 | 5.4 ± 0.6 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 0.015 | 0.635 |
Glu 120 min OGTT (mmol/l) | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 4.7 ± 0.7 | 0.002 | 7.1 ± 2.0 | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 0.016 | 0.178 |
Insulin 0 min OGTT (mU/l) | 22 ± 11.7 | 19.4 ± 10.4 | 0.272 | 24.5 ± 18.4 | 16.8 ± 13.2 | 0.035 | 0.839 |
Insulin 120 min OGTT (mU/l) | 86.4 ± 40.3 [2] | 68.9 ± 58.4 | 0.008 | 118.8 ± 87.5 | 109.1 ± 127.0 | 0.551 | 0.631 |
HOMA IR | 5.1 ± 2.9 | 4.4 ± 2.4 | 0.272 | 5.9 ± 4.3 | 3.7 ± 3.0 | 0.013 | 0.910 |
Cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 0.875 | 4.9 ± 1.1 [1] | 4.5 ± 1.0 [1] | 0.107 | 0.720 |
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.194 | 1.3 ± 0.1 [1] | 1.3 ± 0.2 [1] | 0.627 | 0.239 |
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 0.928 | 3.0 ± 0.9 [1] | 2.7 ± 0.9 [1] | 0.049 | 0.905 |
TG (mmol/l) | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.727 | 1.4 ± 0.7 [1] | 1.2 ± 0.5 [1] | 0.075 | 0.550 |
data are expressed as mean ± SD
acompared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test for related samples, bold values indicate statistically significant differences
bcompared with nonparametric Mann–Whitney test