Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 27;47(1):115–122. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.0278

Fig. 5. DAES showed superior neointima and inflammation suppressive effect compare to PCS in graph F and G. (A) Injury score, (B) fibrin score, (C) internal elastic lamina, (D) lumen area, (E) neointimal area, (F) percent area of stenosis, and (G) inflammation score of BMS, PCS, AES, and DAES. (A), (B), and (G) are expressed as median (interquartile range). NS: not statistically significant, BMS: bare metal stent, PCS: polymer-coated stent, AES: artemisinin-eluting stent, DAES: dihydroartemisinin-eluting stent.

Fig. 5