Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 May 13;22(6):586–594. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000400

Table 1.

Summary of studies assessing relationships between neuropsychological functioning and RSB

Study Sample Size Age Sample Characteristics Neurocognitive Measures Neurocognitive Functions Assessed Measure of Risky Sexual Behavior Outcomes
Aklin, Lejuez, Zvolensky, Kahler, & Gwadz, 2005 N = 51 M = 14.8 (9th – 12th grade) Male = 51%
African American/black = 98%
BART-Y Risk-taking Sex without a condom Risk-taking not related to condom use
Bornovalova, Gwadz, Kahler, Aklin & Lejuez, 2008 N = 96 13 – 18 Male = 52%
African American/black = 100%
BART-Y Risk-taking Sex without a condom Risk-taking mediated relationship between physical, emotional and sexual abuse with HIV risk behavior which included sex without a condom
Derefinko et al., 2014 N = 135 17–26 Male = 100%
Race/ethnicity not reported
BART, Go/No-Go Task Risk-taking and inhibitory control Total number of partners, number of times had sex with a stranger, sex without a condom use Risk-taking associated with number of partners and ever having sex with a stranger
Golub, Starks, Kowalczyk, Thompson, & Parsons, 2012 N = 130 M = 30 Male = 100%
Non-Hispanic white = 38%
Gay or bisexual = 100%
Substance users = 100%
Counting Span, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, Go/No-Go Task, IGT and IGT-variant Executive Function Profiles (i.e., low on all measures, high on all measures and low only on IGT) Number of anal sex acts, number of times had unprotected anal sex or had sex with HIV serdiscordant main partner Low performing group had higher numbers of high risk sex acts and high risk sex acts under the influence compared to low IGT group
Gonzalez et al., 2005 N = 263 M = 44.1 Male = 87%
African American/black = 91%
Met criteria for substance dependence or abuse = 97%
HIV + = 41%
IGT, delayed non-matching to sample, stroop task—reaction time version Decision-making, working memory, inhibitory control Total score calculated with variables like frequency of condom use, number of partners, number of times paid for sex, etc. HIV+ status, sensation seeking and better decision-making associated with RSB
Khurana, Romer, Betancourt, Brodsky, Ginnetta & Hurt, 2012 N = 347 10–12 years old at baseline, follow-up assessment 3 and 4 fours years later Male = 48%
Non-Hispanic white = 55%
Digit Span, Corsi Block, Tapping, Letter two-back, Object two-back, Spatial working memory Working Memory, Impulsivity-acting without thinking and temporal discounting, sensation seeking Age of sex initiation Working memory and impulsivity were associated with age of sexual debut
Khurana, Romer, Betancourt, Brodsky, Ginnetta & Hurt, 2015 N = 387 9–12 years old at baseline, follow-up assessment 3 and 4 fours years later Male = 48%
Non-Hispanic white = 56%
Corsi block tapping, Digit span backwards, Object two-back, Spatial working memory Working memory, acting without thinking and inability to delay gratification, sensation seeking Ever had vaginal sex and vaginal sex without a condom Weak working memory predicts more RSB, even when parental influence is controlled
Lejuez et al., 2007 N = 98 M = 14.8 (9th – 12th grade) Male = 52%
African American/black = 100%
BART-Y Risk-taking Sex without a condom Risk-taking was associated with risk composite score that included having sex without a condom
Lejuez et al., 2002 N = 86 18–25 Male = 50%
Non-Hispanic white = 75%
BART Risk-taking Sex without a condom Risk-taking associated with having sex without a condom
Lejuez et al., 2004 N = 76 21–58 Male = 76%
African American/black = 91%
In-patient at substance use residential treatment center = 100%
BART Risk-taking Sex without a condom Risk-taking related to RSB
Nydegger, Ames, Stacy & Grenard, 2014 N = 196 M = 31.26 Male = 67%
Hispanic = 55%
Drug diversion clients = 100%
Go/No-Go Task Inhibitory control Sex without a condom Greater drug use problems predicted more RSB, however, only among those with poorer inhibitory control
Ross, Coxe, Schuster, Rojas & Gonzalez, 2015 N = 79 17–24 Male = 64%
Non-Hispanic white = 48%
IGT Decision-making Age of vaginal sex initiation and number of oral sex partners Poorer decision-making and more cannabis use moderated the relationship between more conduct disorder symptoms and more RSB.
Schuster, Crane, Mermelstein & Gonzalez, 2012 N = 66 M = 20.77 Male = 62%
Non-Hispanic white = 38%
Cannabis users = 100%
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, IGT, BART, GoStop Task, Monetary Choice Questionnaire Memory, decision-making, risk-taking, inhibitory control, delayed discounting Number of STIs and unplanned pregnancies Greater cannabis use and poorer performance on the IGT and BART associated with more RSB
Wardle, Gonzalez, Bechara, & Martin-Thormeyer, 2010 N = 190 M = 43.53 Male = 79%
African American/black = 93%
Met criteria for substance dependence or abuse = 100%
HIV + = 100%
IGT, delayed non-matching to sample, stroop task—reaction time version Decision-making, working memory, inhibitory control Total score calculated with variables like frequency of condom use, number of partners, number of times paid for sex, etc. Greater emotional distress and more sensation seeking was associated with more RSB but only among those with better decision-making