Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;6(2):83–95. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.98

Table 3. Uganda DHO Views of the Effects of PEPFAR on Non-HIV Health System Components .

Planning Capacity (%) M&E Capacity (%) Mobilize Resources (%) Manage Medical Supplies (%) HR Capacity (%) Coordinate Stakeholders (%) Manage Information (%) Total (%)
Improved 93 (83.0) 91 (81.3) 51 (45.5) 100 (89.3) 88 (78.6) 103 (92.0) 94 (83.9) 620 (79.1)
No effect 8 (7.1) 7 (6.3) 33 (29.5) 7 (6.3) 4 (3.6) 5 (4.5) 7 (6.3) 71 (9.1)
Decreased 5 (4.5) 12 (10.7) 25 (22.3) 2 (1.8) 12 (10.7) 2 (1.8) 3 (2.7) 61 (7.8)
Mixed 3 (2.7) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.9) 2 (1.8) 7 (6.3) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.9) 16 (2.0)
Do not know 3 (2.7) 1 (0.9) 2 (1.8) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.9) 7 (6.3) 16 (2.0)

Abbreviations: DHO, District Health Officer; PEPFAR, President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief; HR, human resource; M&E, monitoring and evaluation.

Data source: Interviews with Ugandan DHOs (or their proxies) in 112 districts between October and December, 2011. Answer choices offered to the respondents were the five in the table: improved, no effect, decreased, mixed, or do not know.