Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;8:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00099

Table 3.

Performance on the RAT and similarity patterns in the response search.

Analysis Humans Model
Average problem accuracy 42% 43%
-Correlation with human data (r) 0.49*
Shortest response sequence 1 1
Longest response sequence 49 33
Average number of responses per trial 7.78 8.44
-Correlation with human data (r) 0.93***
AVERAGE RESPONSE SIMILARITY
-Within vs. across cue clusters 0.189 vs. 0.041 0.141 vs. 0.054
CI: [0.134, 0.162] CI: [0.079, 0.095]
-Permutation test 0.182 vs. 0.040 0.142 vs. 0.054
CI: [0.124, 0.160] CI: [0.077, 0.100]
-Within vs. across cue clusters (cleaned responses) 0.180 vs. 0.039 0.141 vs. 0.054
CI: [0.128, 0.154] CI: [0.079, 0.095]
Baseline vs. actual percentage of response pairs with the same primary cue (two-sided exact binomial test) 33.3 vs. 37.1%*** 34.2 vs. 54.4%***
AVERAGE SIMILARITY BETWEEN ADJACENT AND NON-ADJACENT
RESPONSES
-With different primary cues (across cluster) 0.041 vs. 0.016 0.054 vs. 0.011
CI: [0.063, 0.098] CI: [0.038, 0.047]
-With same primary cues (within cluster) 0.189 vs. 0.108 0.141 vs. 0.076
CI: [0.063, 0.098] CI: [0.057, 0.072]

Stated 95% confidence intervals are computed on the difference of reported mean values. Values significant at p < 0.05 are marked with *, significant at p < 0.001 with ***.