Table 4.
Construct mapping example
| Sub-construct: referrals | Positive effect | Adverse or no effect |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative | 33% of clinicians felt that health status reports contributed to patient referrals some of the time [39] | 50% of clinicians felt that health status reports did not contribute to making patient referrals [39] |
| Non-significant difference in additional treatment post-implementation of a numerical rating scale (p = .461) [43] | ||
| 17% of clinicians felt that health status reports contributed to patient referrals most of the time [39] | ||
| Reducing doctor visits was found to be non-significant after the use of PROMs [39] | ||
| Arthritis-related referrals was found to be non-significant after the use of PROMs [39] | ||
| Qualitative | Based on the scores, clinicians chose to refer the patient to another service [34] |