Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;62(1):73–83. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0856-2

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies on the association between waterpipe smoking and cancer

References Study, year
Region, country
Cases/controls OR (95 % CI) Adjustments Controls characteristics Study quality (NOS)
Selection Comparability Exposure NOS
Head and neck
 Jaferey (1976) CC, 1967–1972
Karachi, Pakistan
1192/3562 3.10 (2.23–4.29) Derived from frequencies, adjusted for sex, cigarettes and bidi smoking Healthy controls matched for age, sex and place of birth ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Feng (2009) CC, 2002–2005
Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia
636/615 0.49 (0.20–1.23) Matched analysis adjusted for age and socio-economical status Hospital controls or friends and family members matched for centre age, sex and childhood household type (urban/rural) ●●○● ○● ○○●● 6
 Khlifi (2013) CC, 2007–2009
Sfax, Tunisia
169/351 2.73 (1.65–4.41) Adjusted for potential risk factors including smoking Population based controls ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Quadri (2015) CC, 2014
Jazan, Saudi Arabia
48/96 4.20 (1.32–13.3) Adjusted for other forms of smoking Hospital controls matched on sex, age (±5 years) and location ●●○● ●● ○○●○ 6
Esophagus
 Cook-Mozaffari (1979) CC, 1975–1976
Caspian littoral, Iran
217/343 M
127/254 F
1.25 (0.74–2.08)
1.15 (0.43–2.94)
Matched analysis Matched on sex, age (±5 years) and residence ○●●● ○● ○○○○ 4
 Nasrollahzadeh (2008) CC, 2003–2007
Golestan, Iran
300/571 1.69 (0.76–3.77)a Matched analysis adjusted for education and ethnicity Matched on sex, age (±2 years) and residence ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Malik (2010) CC, 2006–2008
Kashmir Valley, India
135/195 21.4 (11.6–39.5) Adjusted for age and sex Routine check-up controls matched for age and sex ●●○● ○● ○○●○ 5
 Khan (2011) CC, 2008
Kashmir Valley, India
100/100 9.11 (4.44–18.7) Derived from frequencies
(66/28/6 vs. 15/58/27)
●●●○● ○○ ○○●○ 4
 Dar (2012) CC, 2008–2012
Kashmir Valley, India
702/1663 1.85 (1.41–2.44) Adjusted for age, ethnicity, religion, residence, education, cigarette, nass, bidi, cannabis, gutka, alcohol, fruit and vegetables intake Hospital-based controls matched on sex, age (±5 years) and residence ●●○● ●● ○○●● 7
Stomach
 Pourfarzi (2009) CC, 2003–2005
Ardabil, Iran
217/394 1.14 (0.29–4.42) Adjusted for gender, age group, education, family history of GC, various food habits and H. Pylori infection Community controls matched on sex, age (±5 years) and residence ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Shakeri (2013) CC, 2004–2011
Golestan, Iran
309/613 1.10 (0.30–3.30) Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, fruit and vegetable consumption, socioeconomic status, opium, cigarette and nass use. Healthy controls matched on sex, age (±5 years) and residence ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Karajibani (2014) CC, 2011–2012
Zahedan, Iran
46/46 4.50 (1.17–17.4) Derived from frequencies
(11/46 vs. 3/46)
Matched on sex, age, job, economic status ●●○● ○○ ○○●○ 4
 Sadjadi (2014) Cohort of Helicobacter pylori infected subjects; Ardabil, Iran 36/928 3.44 (1.66–7.11) Adjusted for age, sex, family history of cancer, cigarettes smoking, opium, alcohol, fruit and vegetables and salt. Average follow-up of 10 years ●●●● ●● ●●● 9
Lung
 Qiao (1989) CC, 1967–1984
Yunnan, China
107/107 1.90 (0.40–9.40)* Adjusted for age ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Lubin (1992) CC, 1984–1988
Yunnan, China
427/1011 1.78 (0.80–4.20)* Adjusted for age, residence, type of respondent and years of work Matched on age (±5 years) ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Hsairi (1993) CC, 1988–1989
Tunis, Tunisia
110/110 5.70 (1.20–7.60) Adjusted for age, sex, cigarette consumption and cannabis use Matched on sex, age (±5 years) and cigarettes (±5 cig/day) ●●●● ●● ○○●○ 7
 Gupta (2001) CC, 1995–1997
Chandigarh, India
265/525 1.94 (0.85–4.44) Adjusted for age and education Hospital controls matched on sex and age ●●○● ○● ○○●○ 5
 Koul (2011) CC, 2005–2006
Kashmir Valley, India
251/500 5.83 (3.95–8.60)* Crude Odds Ratio Matched on age and residence ●●○● ●● ○○●○ 6
 Aoun (2013) CC, 2012
Beirut, Lebanon
50/100 6.00 (1.78–20.3) Crude Odds Ratio Hospital controls and visitors matched on sex ●●○● ○○ ○○●○ 4
Bladder
 Makhyoun (1974) CC, 1966–1971
Alexandria and Tanta, Egypt
Bilharzial
278/278
Ctr 87/87
1.08 (0.77–1.51)
0.89 (0.45–1.76)
Derived from frequencies
(113/278 vs. 108/278)
(21/87 vs. 23/87)
Hospital controls matched for antecedent bilharziasis infection, residence and occupation ●●○● ○○ ○○●○ 4
 Bedwani (1997) CC, 1994–1996
Alexandria, Egypt
151/157 0.80 (0.20–4.00) Adjusted for age, education, housing, history of schistosomiasis, high risk occupation and tobacco smoking Hospital controls with acute non-neoplastic, non-urinary tract, non smoking-related condition ●●○● ●● ○○●○ 6
 Wolpert (2010) CC, N/a
Cairo, Minia, Assiut, Egypt
239/540 1.70 (0.38–7.67) Derived from frequencies
(3/239 vs. 4/540)
Matched on sex, age (±5 years) and residence ●●●● ○● ○○●○ 6
 Feki-Tounsi (2013) CC, 2007–2010
Sfax, Tunisia
125/204 1.32 (0.35–5.00) Derived from frequencies
(4/125 vs. 5/204)
Hospital c ontrols consulting for benign disease ●●○● ○○ ○○●○ 4
 Amr (2014) CC, 2006–2011
Cairo, Egypt
1840/2616 1.42 (1.11–1.83)* Crude Odds Ratios Residence matched, population-based controls ●●●● ●○ ○○●○ 6
Colon-rectum
 Bener (2010) CC, 2008–2009
Doha, Qatar
146/282 1.02 (0.62–1.68) Derived from frequencies
(30/146 vs. 57/282)
Matched on sex, race and age (±5 years) ●●○● ○● ○○● 6
 Azizi (2015) CC, 2013–2014
East Azerbaijan, Iran
207/207 1.26 (0.49–3.27) Derived from frequencies
(10/207 vs. 8/207)
Cancer free hospital controls ●●○● ○● ○○●○ 5
Liver
 Soliman (2010) CC, 2007–2009
Tanta, Gharbiah, Egypt
150/150 1.13 (0.62–2.78) Matched analysis adjusted for viral infection Hospital healthy visitors matched on sex and age (±5 years) ●●○● ○● ○○●○ 5
All cancer deaths
 Wu (2013) Cohort, 2000–2011
Araihazar, Bangladesh
47/20033 1.30 (0.78–2.18)
2.51 (1.08–5.82)
Adjusted for age, BMI, education Average follow-up of 7.6 years ●●●● ○● ●●● 8

CC case–control study, NOS Newcastle Ottawa Scale score

aRisk estimate for exclusive waterpipe smokers vs. non-smokers of any type of tobacco